Calculator
Free online calculator with keyboard support: four operations, percentages, parentheses and operation history.
1,291 views
How Order of Operations Works
This calculator evaluates every expression using the standard mathematical convention known as PEMDAS (or BODMAS outside the US): Parentheses first, then Exponents or Roots, then Multiplication and Division evaluated left to right, and finally Addition and Subtraction evaluated left to right. Operations at the same priority level are never reordered arbitrarily — they are always resolved left to right, which matters for expressions that mix division and multiplication.
Take 2 + 3 × 4. Multiplication happens before addition regardless of the order it was typed in, so the calculator computes 3 × 4 = 12 first, then adds 2, for a result of 14 — not 20, which is what a strict left-to-right reading with no precedence rules would give. Wrapping part of an expression in parentheses overrides the default order: (2 + 3) × 4 forces the addition to happen first, giving 5 × 4 = 20.
The same left-to-right rule applies within a single priority tier: 20 − 5 − 3 evaluates as (20 − 5) − 3 = 12, not 20 − (5 − 3) = 18, because subtraction chains resolve from the left. The identical logic governs chained division: 100 ÷ 5 ÷ 2 equals (100 ÷ 5) ÷ 2 = 10, not 100 ÷ (5 ÷ 2) = 40. This left-to-right rule for operators sharing the same priority is what keeps a calculator output predictable even in long chained expressions.
What You Should Know
Not every expression has one universally agreed answer. 6 ÷ 2(1 + 2) is a famous example that divides even professional mathematicians: solved strictly left to right under PEMDAS, since division and multiplication share equal priority, it comes to 6 ÷ 2 × 3 = 9. But many people read "2(1+2)" — implicit multiplication written without a × sign — as binding more tightly than an explicit division sign, which would give 6 ÷ (2×3) = 1 instead. This is not a bug or a calculator malfunction; it is genuine ambiguity in mathematical notation itself, specifically whether implicit multiplication (writing a number directly next to parentheses) should be treated as higher priority than explicit ×/÷ symbols. Different calculators and programming languages make different choices here — many scientific calculators and most programming languages such as Python and JavaScript treat all multiplication and division as equal priority evaluated left to right, while some other calculators and typesetting conventions give implicit multiplication higher priority. When an expression is ambiguous, the safest approach is always to add explicit parentheses so there is no room left for interpretation.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does it follow order of operations?
Yes. 2 + 3 × 4 gives 14, not 20 — multiplication and division are evaluated before addition and subtraction. Use parentheses to override: (2 + 3) × 4 = 20.
How does the percent key work?
It divides by 100: 150 × 20% equals 150 × 0.20 = 30. It also works inside larger expressions.
Can I use my keyboard?
Yes — digits, operators, parentheses, Enter (=), Backspace (delete) and Esc (clear all) are all supported.
Why does 6 ÷ 2(1 + 2) sometimes give 9 and sometimes 1?
It comes down to whether implicit multiplication, writing 2(3) instead of 2×3, is treated as higher priority than explicit division. This calculator, like most programming languages and modern scientific calculators, treats multiplication and division as equal priority and evaluates left to right, giving 6 ÷ 2 × 3 = 9. Calculators that give implicit multiplication special priority would compute 6 ÷ (2×3) = 1 instead. Neither answer is wrong — it reflects a real inconsistency in how mathematical notation is taught and used, so when it matters, write the expression with explicit parentheses.
Can I nest parentheses inside each other?
Yes — parentheses can be nested as deeply as needed, for example ((2 + 3) × (4 − 1)) ÷ 5, and the calculator resolves the innermost parentheses first before working outward, exactly as PEMDAS requires.
Similar Tools
Report a Problem
Calculator
Comments
No comments yet — be the first to write one!